Just a quick post here about the future plans for tgua.dev, they are currently as follows:

- Create new CF page instance and upload static version of Dustinbrett.com, link to db.tgua.dev(Incomplete)
- Create new CF page instance and upload static version of derg.rest/tomxcd.me, link to td.tgua.dev
- Try to create/switch tgua.dev Primary to Dynamic server, maybe see if I can keep a Rpi or similar at someone else’s house, since they don’t have starlink?
- Add backup/proxy/different urls
- Allow for easy complete offline download of tgua.dev with all features fully functional(External resources like embedded youtube videos excluded)

Timeline of events

Can people deserve to die? A complex question posed by several over the years, can a crime be so terrible and vulgar that it warrants death? Homicide, Murder, death. Can a person truly be downright bad? Downright evil?
Maybe even more pressing is the issue of good Vs. evil, is there truly a bad and good? A good or evil? Is there truly a difference beyond the labels we assign each other? Is evil more than a construct we create to discriminate against those we see unfit, those we dislike, those we hate.
If some are evil and some are good, who decides that distinction? If one side says the other is evil, yet the other says the same is true for them, who decides? Who truly justifies what is good and evil? Who decides who has taken an action so bad to be labeled a devil and murdered, and who is labeled a saint and showered with glory.
Should Luigi Mangione be put to the block for (allegedly) killing someone commonly known as evil, and seen as a downright devil by some? Should those seeking justice for “evil” actions be held liable, even when some might see it as morally right?
Is someone who kills an evil a greater evil? Does death truly discourage those who are already desperate enough to kill for what they see as the greater good? Is it wrong to seek justice, To take matters into thy own hands? Or should vigilantism be praised with honor and hope?
Such questions have plagued the human mind for centuries, yet to be definitively answered, though the questions posed are important to the continued existence of humanity and its constructs.
Is order, good and evil, a mere facade, a scaffold we used to try to justify our continued existence? Is there such a thing as “justice” and not just a supposed system to maintain control and order? Is social hierarchy and discrimination any better than anarchy?
The order of hierarchy is subjective. Is it really better to have a society where some are born into wealth, and live a long prosperous life, while others, to no fault of their own, are born poor and live a short terrible life? I think not, but at the same time is the idea of pure anarchy, death, destruction, yet equal opportunity any better?

The ramblings of a madman some shall call, an insane rant from a retarded mind; But Philosophy is more, philosophy is questioning the very existence we live, our perception, our morals, our ethics, our humanity. Philosophy is everything. For thou may live a life of grandeur, yet philosophy still reaches thee, for Philosophy is universal, a constant, a reminder, of mortality, of death, of life, of murder, of suicide.
While I may not be a philosopher, the current state of the world is frightening; while thy assets may be in order, chaos nonetheless unfolds, the world in chaos, in madness. Yet we don’t question it–others anguish, pain, tears, we don’t spare a second though at the idea of homicide, suicide, genocide, we accept it, accept it as normal, as natural.
While nonetheless we’ll all die, death early is ultimately unneeded, a short life serves no purpose but to harm the minds of others.
While thou mind may not be preoccupied with such ponderings, nonetheless it’s an unyielding fact, a fact as set in stone as Athena Parthenos, unyielding, final, unchanged. The human mind, a misunderstood, unknown, and unhelpful existence; it serves no purpose to the world cut short, yet harms the world further in life.
A paradox, that’s what it is, an unknown, impossible scenario, yet at the same time present, possible, likely. Will the human existence continue? Should it continue? The continual existence harms the environment and world as a whole, yet the human mind is set on self preservation, on life, on prosperity.
So should the human race, the human mind, the human malice, anger, and harm continue? Should the world be subject to its unyielding horrors, or should it be cut short, with death, premature death, bittersweet death.
While death would be positive for the world overall, is it against the human condition to die, to be cut short? Or should we ignore the human condition, of hunger and malice, of greed and self preservation, and cut our lives short? Should we follow the thinking of Albert Camus or Arthur Schopenhauer? Of continued life, or death?
Should suicide be a choice? Penalized for wanting life to end? Or should it be accepted as normal, natural, wanted? Should we even consider it as an option when it harms the fragile minds of others, their illusion of life and death as discussed in Philosophy V2(/∞)? Or should we consider it taboo, unwanted, unneeded?
While death would benefit, it would also harm, suicide would harm the minds of others. So the dilemma still stands, should it be accepted or criminalized? Criminalizing it would decrease the likelihood of it, sure, but it would also take away the free will of life and death, suffering or blissful ignorance.
Penalizing people for committing suicide or attempting to commit suicide is generally seen a good thing, sure banning it would make several people continue living, however is it truly worth living if that life is full of pain, sorrow, and depression?
On the other hand, allowing it openly would drastically decrease the population. Without the threat of punishment suicide would become much more common and accepted; but would allow for the freewill of life and death, it would allow those who feel like life isn’t worth living escape a terrible reality.
Would it benefit or harm? That question is a question yet to be definitively decided by the human race, yet to be pondered if life is truly worth living, if we’ll actually impact the world, the galaxy, the universe in a meaningful, lasting way, if our lives actually serve a purpose.
Purpose, yet another paradox, while some try to explain the purpose of the human race by ceding a plan given by deities, but these art yet false promises, false hope, not a true solution to the question posed; does the human race serve a purpose other than to exist?

"86" is an emotionally challenging, morally ambiguous, make-you-question-society anime that tackles complex ideas of love in the midst of war and societal racism. It delves into societal issue and pressure, heartbreak and sorrow, death and war. It recons with unimagine grief and heartbreak, indescribably bittersweet, an emotional journey you'll never forget, even on the way to your deathbed. It's a show you'll both regret–and enjoy watching, a paradox… a heartbreak.